migraineurs and CFLs: a crucial public health issue

I have posted quite a bit around the web on this subject, and even about my personal struggles with fluorescent lighting, but until today, I have not mentioned an important petition regarding migraineurs and compact fluorescent lightbulbs (commonly called CFLs) - at least, until now.

First, some background: in December 2007, the US Congress passed the Energy Independence & Security Act of 2007, a comprehensive piece of legislation designed to decrease our country's gobbling-up of energy. Buried in this was a mandate to phase out all incandescent lighting by 2012.

The idea behind this particular piece of the law is that incandescent lighting is incredibly inefficient, and more efficient forms of lighting are already available on the market. By 2012, when US consumers are no longer able to buy regular incandescent bulbs, they will have to buy more efficient forms of lighting, thus reducing our energy consumption even if no one's energy consumption habits change. In other words, if you're one of those people who leaves lights on 15 hours out of the day, by using CFLs instead of incandescents, you'll cut your energy consumption (and electric bill) rather significantly without much effort on your part.

Sounds good, right? It all is - in theory.

Here's the problem. For many migraineurs, myself included, CFLs trigger debilitating migraine attacks. CFLs also have been shown anecdotally to cause health issues for other people, including those with epilepsy and lupus. So while none of us will argue with the importance of being "green", CFLs are not a viable option for us.

Unfortunately, with currently available technology, CFLs are the easiest replacement to make. They are made to fit in traditional lamp sockets and, while more expensive than incandescents, are still in a close enough price range that most consumers will choose these over other options.

Like many other migraineurs, this legislation truly worries me. If 2012 rolls around and incandescent bulbs become unavailable, I will not have many viable options. I can live my life in the dark, I can live by candlelight, or I can invest in significantly more expensive technologies, like light-emitting diodes (LEDs), that are also not ideal for typical household use.

Here's the thing: with the way the law is currently written, none of this is likely to change in the next four years. And that's why the Migraine Disease & Headache Bloggers Association has stepped up and written a petition to Congress.

Instead of outlawing incandescent lighting completely, we are asking Congress to amend their legislation, focusing on energy efficiency standards that all lighting would be required to meet. These standards would allow lighting manufacturers to continue to make incandescent lighting, but require them to find ways to make them more efficient. This would also allow CFLs to stay on the market, as well as encourage other new technologies to develop. By focusing on energy standards rather than specific technologies, the amended law would no longer be a knee-jerk reaction to the green craze. Instead, it would be a future-thinking law that will allow flexibility of technology, while still meeting the intent of the original law.

Migraineurs are not opposed to the use of CFLs - that is, unless we've determined this type of lighting is a trigger and we're being forced to use it in our own home. Many of us are trying to find ways to shrink our carbon footprints. We should not be forced to suffer because of a well-intentioned piece of legislation passed by Congress. This is a national health issue, affecting many of the 36 million American migraineurs. Surely we should have some choice about our home lighting? Surely we should not be completely eliminated from public life because of a lack of knowledge about the health issues associated with CFLs?

I ask all of you to take a minute and sign our petition, which you can find here: protect migraineurs from CFLs. Please pass this along to all those in your life. It's likely some of them are migraineurs, and they may not even know they're affected by CFLs.

For more information about energy efficiency in your own home, please see the US Department of Energy's great website, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. In particular, Types of Lighting is an excellent basic overview.

For further reading, please see these posts by my fellow migraine bloggers:

• Teri Robert, Lighting, CFLs and Migraine Triggers
  
• Megan Oltman, Protect Migraineurs from Compact Fluorescents
• Megan Oltman, Alternatives to Compact Fluorescents - for Migraineurs and the Rest of You!
• Diana Lee, Please Sign CFL Petition to Protect Migraineurs
  
• Help My Hurt, Saving Energy May Be Causing Some Migraines
• RainGem, Fluorescent Lights as Migraine Triggers - the Petition
• My Life with Migraine, Protect Migraineurs from Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs
• Pink Pearl Girl, Migraine and the Energy Independence & Security Act of 2007
• The Migraine Girl, Urgent: a Petition
  

Thanks for reading.

-MJ

shred of normalcy

If I've been a bit absent from the blogging world, it's because I was traveling last week. I spent most of last week at an architecture convention in Boston, followed by a weekend in Virginia for a friends' wedding. Interspersed in the trip was time with my family, DBF's family and friends from college.

In other words, a very busy trip, and one many migraineurs would dread.

I had been looking forward to this trip for months, because the conference promised to be a good one and because I would get to see many family and friends I don't spend much time with. (The price of picking up and moving clear across the country.) But, as the trip loomed closer, I could see the potential triggers stacking, and no easy way to avoid them: the flights, including a red-eye to get to Boston; irregular sleeping and eating habits; fluorescent lighting; long, full days with much more activity than I'm used to; different weather; brighter sunlight than we have in the Pacific Northwest; more flying; long driving trips. The list went on and on. Add to that the stress over trying to keep my strict gluten-free/dairy-free diet and I just wanted to cancel the trip.

But, because of personal and professional obligations, I packed up my bags, kissed DBF goodbye (with promises to see him in Virginia), and off I went. And I survived the trip, though I'm not sure about the cost to my body.

The conference was wonderful, and I made some very valuable professional contacts while I was there. Not to mention, I learned a lot. The days were long, though, very long, and by the end of it I was exhausted. The first two days I went on two walking tours, which I probably would have bagged if I hadn't paid for them upfront. (No refunds.) These were followed by many seminars in a very cold convention center under fluorescent lighting. A recipe for disaster. I skipped about half of the sessions I intended to go to, but I also managed to skip the guilt. Even when I had to cancel a dinner with the principals of my firm because I felt so sick.

Going to the wedding I thought would do me in, but taking it very easy on myself all week meant I still had some energy to coast through the weekend. It was a huge relief to get home nonetheless, away from the expectations of friends and family I don't get to see as often as I would like. My family "gets it" better than I could hope for, since both my mom and sister are migraineurs. DBF's parents try to be understanding, and I never feel pressured by them. But it becomes hard to say no to friends I haven't seen in years, especially when they don't understand the "headaches" I mysteriously suffer from.

A few essential survival skills I learned on this trip:

1. Plan about half as much activity as I think I can do. Reasonably, that's all I will have energy to do. The rest of the time I will need to rest and recuperate, to make sure I have energy to make it through the whole trip.
2. Bring plenty of migraine-friendly snacks for both the plane/car travel, and just to have in the hotel room. Always carry some in my purse to help avoid the unpredictable meal times that seem to be a requirement of traveling.
3. Comfort measures! I packed my robe and slippers, as well as a pillow and stuffed animal from home. Having these in my hotel room helped me to feel like I was still at home.
4. Ask for what you need. My hotel had recently "gone green" and switched to compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs), which are a migraine trigger for me. My sister very politely talked to the front desk for me and explained the problem, and within a half hour they replaced all the bulbs in my room with less-problematic incandescents. There's no need to quietly suffer. Plus, explaining this problem has the double benefit of educating the hotel staff, so other migraineurs who may stay in that hotel will run into less confusion from the hotel staff.
5. Balance aggravation vs cost. I bought some souvenirs at the conference and was worried about trying to get them home. My checked luggage was already overweight, and I didn't want to make my carry-on too heavy to deal with. I decided it was worth the cost to ship my souvenirs home to myself, and pay a little extra for overweight luggage so my carry-on was manageable. While I may have had to pay more money to do this, I saved myself a lot of frustration and energy I would have wasted on luggage.
   
6. Most importantly, leave the guilt at home. I had to cancel a lot of plans at the last minute because of how I was feeling, or in the interest of not feeling worse later. I reminded myself that migraine is a real disease that requires management, and feeling guilty because I can't do as much as others will serve no purpose other than making me feel worse. So I dumped the guilt and focused on making myself feel better so I could enjoy my trip.

I didn't get to do nearly as much as I wanted, or spend as much time with my family and friends as I wished. But I survived the trip without too much severe pain, or too intolerable migraine symptoms. This trip reinforced for me how important it is to be compassionate to myself, to be kind and understanding when I'm not feeling well. To remind myself it's not my fault. And to do for myself what I need.

I'd love for there to be a day when I can travel again like I used to, a higher energy kind of travel that doesn't require so much rest and recuperation. But for now, I'll take this: a shred of normalcy in my storm of chronic migraine.

-MJ

photophobia and fluorescent lighting: a quest

Like many other migraineurs, I suffer from photophobia, a sensitivity to light. My photophobia is constant, and gets worse as my pain gets worse, but since I've been living with this particular migraine since November, the photophobia has been particularly stubborn as well.

Also like many other migraineurs, I cannot tolerate fluorescent lighting. Part of the issue is the color of the light itself: the fluorescents at my office are tinted a warmer yellow, which I can live with, as opposed to the horrendous (and cheaper) blue-white found in many stores. These fluorescents not only immediately worsen my migraine pain, dizziness and nausea, but also have an unpleasant tendency of sending me running to the nearest bathroom with soupey poopies within 15 minutes. If my office had this blue-white lighting, I would have had to leave my job already.

Unfortunately, the tint is not the entire story. The imperceptible flicker of fluorescents is enough to drive the sensitive migraine brain wacko. This makes it a particularly difficult problem to deal with. Many of us cope by wearing sunglasses, or tinted glasses, but this is not always a viable option for me since I work in a field where I regularly meet with clients and consultants, so wearing sunglasses to these meetings would not be appropriate. It also doesn't do anything for the flicker, really, just gives our eyes a break from the brightness of the lighting.

What is a migraineur to do?

Fortunately, the woman in charge of office services at my office is also a migraineur, so she was able to help me get the fixtures over my cube turned off. This makes it possible for me to get through a workday without being miserable. It does nothing, however, for the fluorescents in our conference rooms or in the rest of our office.

Some months ago, I came across mention of the use of Nike Maxsight tinted contact lenses as a way to ease light sensitivity in Dr Alexander Mauskop's Headache NewsBlog. This reference simmered in the back of my head for a while, and I have since come across other mentions of the use of contacts to address light sensitivity. The Migraine Girl asked in an entry about MigraLens and Irlen contacts specifically for combating fluorescent lighting sensitivity.

After much Googling, I finally scheduled an appointment with my ophthalmologist when I discovered that his office carries the Nike lenses. I'll also note here that Nike discontinued these lenses a few months ago, but I figured I could at least schedule the appointment and talk with the eye doc and see if he had any suggestions. Who knows, the Nike lenses could be my saviors, and I would just order them in bulk from an internet supplier.

I went in for my appointment two and a half weeks ago with my eye doc, and explained my problem. He thought for a few minutes, then came out with a surprising statement - he had a few ideas, and he wasn't sure what would work but he was willing to work with me until we found a reasonable solution. He specializes in contact lenses, so I felt somewhat confident in his statement. He had some trial Nike lenses at his other office that he would look through to see if he could find any for me, and he would also dig up some other trial tinted lenses - just regular cosmetic FreshLook lenses with a slight tint - for me to try.

By the end of that week, he had the Nike lenses ready for me. He scheduled a two-week follow-up appointment with me, to give me time to try out the lenses.

First reaction: they make me look like some sort of demonic beastie (migraine beastie, maybe?). The ones I tried are the grey-green tint, which actually wash my eyes out to black. A very strange effect, but one I would put up with if they solved the fluorescent lighting problem. I would even put up with the startled coworkers.

Unfortunately, I only made it a few days with the lenses. I discovered my brain started to freak out after wearing them for about six hours. The tinting in them was too strange a color for all-day wear. (Imagine the color of bug lights - that's what color these lenses made everything.) This tint was especially pronounced on cloudy days, and we have a lot of those here in the Pacific Northwest. I also had a run of several severe migraine days, which may or may not be related to the lenses. They did help out a lot with sunlight though, when worn under my regular sunglasses, so it wasn't a total loss.

I had my follow-up appointment with my eye doc today. He offered me another, much more expensive option, which is prosthetic lenses. With these custom lenses, he can control exactly how much light is allowed into my eye, and I will not see any sort of a tint. He took some measurements of my eyes for these lenses and told me my pupils seem to dilate more than they should (not surprising - they also dilate unevenly depending on the severity of my migraine).

I feel these are a better option for me than the Nike lenses, but custom = expensive. He's taking a look into pricing for me and his office will call before they order them. The price tag should come in somewhere under $1000 - I may be able to get some medical insurance coverage for this, but it's not likely. (My vision insurance is basically only enough to cover my annual exam.)

I will be seeing my new headache specialist in just under a month, and I plan to pick his brain about this, at least because I want to see if he'll write a letter of medical necessity. He may have some other ideas too, who knows. The nice thing about these lenses is that they will reduce the amount of light entering my eyes in the periphery, which I think may help quite a bit with the fluorescent lighting issue. It won't solve it - really, nothing short of avoidance or removal will - but it's something.

Before I make this much of an investment, I will be doing some thinking about this. A part of me had hoped that my migraines would resolve somewhat quickly so I wouldn't have to deal with the photophobia/fluorescent lighting issue. But that is not likely to happen, and I need to find some ways to make my life more livable in the meantime.

Crazy idea? Maybe. As a side note, more blog space will be devoted to the fluorescent lighting issue in the future, on the advocacy side of things. Stay tuned for updates.